Organization

Scientific committee:

• Alexia Auffèves, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes
• Patrice Bertet, CEA, Université Paris Saclay (Palaiseau)
• Antoine Browaeys, CNRS, Inst. Optique (Palaiseau)
• Thierry Chanelière, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes
• Pascal Degiovanni, CNRS, ENS de Lyon
• Eleni Diamanti, CNRS, Sorbonne Université (Paris)
• Anaïs Dréau, CNRS, Université de Montpellier
• Iordanis Kerenidis, CNRS, Université de Paris
• Tristan Meunier, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes
• Alexei Ourjoumtsev, CNRS, Collège de France (Paris)
• Simon Perdrix, CNRS, Université de Lorraine (Metz-Nancy)
• Nicolas Treps, Sorbonne Université (Paris)

Organization committee:

• Tessa Adrian-Roux, ENS de Lyon
• Audrey Bienfait, CNRS, ENS de Lyon
• Farah Daoulet, ENS de Lyon
• Pascal Degiovanni, CNRS, ENS de Lyon (President)
• Omar Fawzi, INRIA, ENS de Lyon
• Benjamin Huard, ENS de Lyon
• Tommaso Roscilde, ENS de Lyon

With the remote help of

• Anaïs Dréau, CNRS, Université de Montpellier
• Alexei Ourjoumtsev, CNRS, Collège de France (Paris)

Selection process for contributed talks:

The selection of contributed talks is based on the following criteria:

• Broad interest, assessed upon review by the scientific comittee. 
• Topics. The selection is balanced between the five main themes of the GDR, each of them having a well-defined number of time slots:
  
  • Fundamental Quantum Aspects
  • Quantum Communication and Cryptography
  • Quantum Sensing & Metrology
  • Quantum Simulation
  • Quantum Processing, Algorithms, and Computing
  When submitting your abstract, choose your theme carefully since it impacts your chances to be selected.
• Geography and research groups. Our choice of talks reflects the dynamism of our research community as a whole. Getting more than one talk per research group is therefore a rare event.
• Parity and equity. We promote submissions from women and early-stage researchers. 

The selection of abstracts involves the whole scientific committee through the following steps:

• Abstracts are rated by at least three experts chosen among the members of the scientific comittee. The mark reflects the scientific level of the contribution and its adequacy to the theme seleted by the applicant.
• The time slots of a given theme are attributed to the best ranked contributions based on the criteria above.
• The board validates the selection.